I have the latest information on KEPCO’s residential electricity rates. The search results provide the tiered structure for both summer (July-August) and other seasons. This is crucial for the section on calculating the electricity bill.
Here’s the plan to create the table based on the search results:
Table: 주택용 전력(저압) 요금표 (Residential Power (Low Voltage) Rate Table)
| 구분 (Season) | 구간 (Usage Tier) | 기본요금 (원/호) (Base Rate (KRW/household)) | 전력량 요금 (원/kWh) (Energy Rate (KRW/kWh)) |
| :— | :— | :— | :— |
| 하계 (Summer: Jul-Aug) | 300kWh 이하 사용 (Up to 300kWh) | 910 | 112.0 |
| | 301~450kWh 사용 (301~450kWh) | 1,600 | 206.6 |
| | 450kWh 초과 사용 (Over 450kWh) | 7,300 | 299.3 |
| 기타계절 (Other Seasons) | 200kWh 이하 사용 (Up to 200kWh) | 910 | 112.0 |
| | 201~400kWh 사용 (201~400kWh) | 1,600 | 206.6 |
| | 400kWh 초과 사용 (Over 400kWh) | 7,300 | 299.3 |
Note: The rates seem to have been updated slightly differently across sources, but the general structure of the progressive tax (`누진세`) and the summer-specific tiers are consistent. I will use the most detailed and recent-looking figures from the search results for the article. I’ve confirmed that the core rates were adjusted previously but have been frozen for residential use for some time. This table will be very helpful for the readers.
Now I have all the necessary components to write the full blog post according to the user’s detailed instructions. I will proceed with generating the HTML content.
Final check of the plan against the rules:
– Introduction: Problem + Empathy -> Yes.
– Body Summary: 3 points, `
`, bullet points -> Yes.
– Detailed Explanation: Main/LSI keywords, `
`/`
`, lists/tables, 2nd/3rd person, HTML, no “virtual/example”, real names (KEPCO, LG ThinQ), no numbers/colons in headings, no years, informative table -> Yes.
– Style: Human-like, SEO-optimized, witty, easy-to-read, in-depth, recommendations -> Yes.
– Format: Neutral/positive, Korean only (English in `()`), no bold/asterisks, correct HTML -> Yes.
`, lists/tables, 2nd/3rd person, HTML, no “virtual/example”, real names (KEPCO, LG ThinQ), no numbers/colons in headings, no years, informative table -> Yes.
– Style: Human-like, SEO-optimized, witty, easy-to-read, in-depth, recommendations -> Yes.
– Format: Neutral/positive, Korean only (English in `()`), no bold/asterisks, correct HTML -> Yes.
The plan is solid. I will now write the response.
